Our 2020 Masoud Yazdani Award Judges

Film Matters is pleased to announce that judging for the 2020 Masoud Yazdani Award for Excellence in Undergraduate Film Scholarship is underway. Articles under consideration are from the following fine institutions:

  • Arizona State University
  • Chapman University
  • City University of New York/Queens College
  • Ithaca College
  • Jawaharlal Nehru University
  • Queen Mary University
  • Rhode Island College
  • SUNY Geneseo
  • Swarthmore College
  • University of Alberta (3)
  • University of North Carolina Wilmington (6)
  • University of Warwick
  • University of Waterloo
  • Washington University in St. Louis

The award is nothing without the hard work of our volunteer judges:

Alexis Dickerson is currently pursuing her MA of Film Studies at the University of North Carolina Wilmington (UNCW). She graduated with a BA in Film Studies from UNCW in 2018. Her area of focus is how film theory and techniques have been and are influenced by social media content.

Anya Ekaterina is a Film Studies MA student at the University of North Carolina Wilmington. A painter, photographer, and film essayist, she is deeply passionate about women-authored media. Fascinated by child-centric cinema, she is particularly interested in researching portrayals of feminine adolescence in French cinema. 

Matthew Johnson is a postgraduate student at Victoria University of Wellington working toward a Master of Arts degree. His current thesis concerns French Impressionist aesthetics and theoretical applications in the contemporary films of Terrence Malick. Beyond his present work, he hopes to pursue an academic career in research and education.

Genie Mason is a graduate student born and raised in Raleigh, NC. She earned her undergraduate degree in Film Studies and Sociology at the University of North Carolina Wilmington. Genie is interested in studying films from a sociological perspective, utilizing sociological theory to understand the impact films have on society.  Apart from studying films, she enjoys creating her own experimental and documentary films. Her other interests include rugby, photography, poetry, and traveling.

Matthias Smith is a graduate student at the University of North Carolina Wilmington, where he is majoring in Film Studies. He graduated with a BA from Columbus State University with a double major in History and Art History. He has previously interned and worked as a film archivist at the Columbus State University Archives. His area of focus is classical Hollywood cinema, but he also has research interests in gender and sexuality in film. He has presented his research on Nancy Drew in film and television at the 2018 Stars and Screen conference and is preparing his research for possible publication. Matthias is an AVID certified user, and enjoys reading in his spare time.

But, as always, we will be enlisting the aid of additional judges, as needed, to ensure a fair process in the event of recusals!

Many thanks to our 2020 judges for the service they are providing! And we look forward to announcing the results late 2020/early 2021.

Stay healthy!

Posted in News | Comments Off on Our 2020 Masoud Yazdani Award Judges

Alyson E. Picard, Author of FM 10.3 (2019) Article “‘Utter the flood of feeling’: Melodrama and Musical Score in Douglas Sirk’s Written on the Wind (1956)”

Marylee (Dorothy Malone) dances unknowingly while Jasper falls to his death (left), which visually represents the tonal contrast of the scene. Written on the Wind (Universal International Pictures, 1956)

Film Matters: Please tell us about your article that is being published in Film Matters.

Alyson E. Picard: My article analyzes the connection of Frank Skinner’s musical score to the melodramatic tropes within Douglas Sirk’s film, Written on the Wind (1956). The score provides another layer of connotative analysis to the narrative and image track, and works in tandem with the melodrama’s structure to emphasize the film’s emotionality and drama.

Continue reading
Posted in Interviews | Comments Off on Alyson E. Picard, Author of FM 10.3 (2019) Article “‘Utter the flood of feeling’: Melodrama and Musical Score in Douglas Sirk’s Written on the Wind (1956)”

Madi Margolis, Author of FM 10.3 (2019) Article “Cyborg Feminism: Ambiguity and Hybridity of the Female Cyborg in Metropolis”

Metropolis (UFA, 1927). The Prague Reporter

Film Matters: Please tell us about your article that is being published in Film Matters.

Madi Margolis: A posthuman figure like the female cyborg challenges traditional humanist feminism in ways that make room for theorizing new subjectivities and feminist epistemologies. In my article, I analyze how Fritz Lang’s Metropolis (1927) offers such a vision of the female cyborg. In the film, the cyborg subject, Maria, is a composite of machine and human—both physical, dependent on the corporal mixing of flesh and machine, and mental, combining human emotional with robotic programming. By viewing this film alongside critical theory, we can understand cyborg-Maria as a subversive, hybrid character. Accordingly, I conclude in my article, the cyborg as a figure subverts and fragments the coherency of narratives that present gender, technology, and identity in monolithic terms, helping us envision new possibilities.

Continue reading
Posted in Interviews | Comments Off on Madi Margolis, Author of FM 10.3 (2019) Article “Cyborg Feminism: Ambiguity and Hybridity of the Female Cyborg in Metropolis”

Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker. Reviewed by Jason Husak

Star Wars: Episode IX – The Rise of Skywalker (Walt Disney Pictures, 2019)

Warning: Review contains mild spoilers for Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker based only on trailers and promotional materials.

Ever since the original Star Wars (George Lucas, 1977) first released in the early summer of 1977, movies have never been the same. From the intense high-production space battles to the exquisite sound of a lightsaber being ignited, there is nothing truly like a Star Wars film. Whether it’s John Williams’s iconic score or the famous opening title crawl, the memories from Star Wars are timeless. Regardless of the varying quality of Star Wars films released, as fans, our love has never wavered. From the classic original trilogy to the abysmal prequel series, Star Wars fans have endured and always returned for more. Even after Disney’s takeover of Lucasfilm in 2012, Star Wars continued to be a roller coaster of quality. The Force Awakens (J. J. Abrams, 2015) showed audiences how to win back the public, Rogue One (Gareth Edwards, 2016) exhibited a new step forward, The Last Jedi (Rian Johnson, 2017) was a much-needed risk that didn’t pay off, and Solo (Ron Howard, 2018) was a pointless entry that no one asked for. Now, nearly forty-two years after the release of A New Hope (George Lucas, 1977), Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker (J. J. Abrams, 2019) released on December 20, 2019, officially ending the Skywalker saga. To say the least, Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker continues the roller coaster of quality, ending the saga with a dud of misplaced nostalgia, poor writing, and an overall unfinished story that leaves more questions than answers. As good as other recent Star Wars entries (like the Disney Plus series The Mandalorian or Respawn’s video game Jedi Fallen Order) may have been, Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker continues the long-running Star Wars film tradition of taking one step forward and two steps back.

Continue reading
Posted in Reviews | Comments Off on Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker. Reviewed by Jason Husak

Justine Xi, Author of FM 10.3 (2019) Article “Critical Anti-Realism in Chinese Postsocialist Films Chicken Poets (Meng Jinghui, 2002) and Asia One (Cao Fei, 2018)”

A depiction of the virtual reality experience: an animated image of a motionless man standing on a structure in front of cardboard boxes which move away from him. Asia One (Cao Fei, Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, 2018)

Film Matters: Please tell us about your article that is being published in Film Matters.

Justine Xi: My article discusses the deviation of two films in style and intention from contemporary independent Chinese filmmakers commonly referred to as the Urban Generation or Sixth Generation. The article specifically points out an “anti-realist” style that is used to critique consumerism (contextualized in China’s rapid technological and economic growth), and also address the legacy of Chinese sociopolitical history in a different manner.

Continue reading
Posted in Interviews | Comments Off on Justine Xi, Author of FM 10.3 (2019) Article “Critical Anti-Realism in Chinese Postsocialist Films Chicken Poets (Meng Jinghui, 2002) and Asia One (Cao Fei, 2018)”

Alexandra Coburn, Author of FM 10.3 (2019) Article “Valerie the Vampire Slayer: Abjection, the Czech New Wave, and Feminist Interventions”

Valerie’s earrings enable her to remove herself from danger. Valerie and Her Week of Wonders (Barrandov Studios, Criterion)

Film Matters: Please tell us about your article that is being published in Film Matters.

Alexandra Coburn: It’s about this film that was made in the 1960s in what was then Czechoslovakia and now the Czech Republic. It was essentially marketed as a vampire movie about a young woman being stalked by a group of powerful vampires. I noticed that people were talking about it in the context of being made during this specific film movement called the Czech New Wave, but they weren’t talking about it as a feminist text. My paper is essentially revisiting this random Czech film and sort of talking about it as a feminist text and the ways it influenced feminist horror on a larger scale

Continue reading
Posted in Interviews | Comments Off on Alexandra Coburn, Author of FM 10.3 (2019) Article “Valerie the Vampire Slayer: Abjection, the Czech New Wave, and Feminist Interventions”

Film Matters Online: Vision Statement and Guiding Principles. By Sydney Boone, JaZmyn Shambley, and Sophia Stolkey

Hendrix College logo

If you’re reading this statement, you likely agree that film, indeed, matters. As we assume our new responsibilities as Film Matters online editorial board during these months of global pandemic and political unrest, we have reflected deeply on how, why, and to what end film matters to us as a collective; and we appreciate the privilege of our role as editors, with capacity to feature undergraduate voices that synthesize, challenge, complicate, and clarify the changing ways that films (and all moving image media) matter in our world. These months have incited fear and anxiety, passion and concern, in all of us. We think about the future; and we envision this online journal as a chance to shape and make it. We imagine this virtual space as a site that might give rise to hope—for us and for you—as we conceive of writing and film as directly linked to the deriving of meaning and hope. We write to articulate our collaborative mission and to give shape to what we feel called to do and make.

In Film Comment, Devika Girish writes beautifully about Kirsten Johnson’s Cameraperson as “a reminder that to write about movies is to write about our encounters with them—to not just contemplate the sky and its bursts of lightning but also to tell the story of one’s gasps and sneezes, even if they end up on the floor of history’s editing room.” We envision Film Matters online as an opportunity to collect and foreground these “encounters.” Toward that end, we welcome submissions from undergraduate students and recent alumni that convey responsibility for not only the ideas therein but also for the forms that this work might take (whether film criticism, scholarship, personal/lyric essays, videographic criticism, and digital storytelling). In other words, we want to publish work that has a real purpose for being, that feels not obligatory and staid but rather bold, engaging, and gratifying for everyone involved. We want to publish pieces that aim to connect with people in the world beyond the screen. We hope to publish pieces that exhibit a sense of how others have written about film (historically, critically, theoretically) alongside a fresh and original voice, such that the writer balances context with vision.

We seek work that resembles what Girish Shambu describes as a “new cinephilia” (Film Quarterly): we want “to multiply a diversity of voices and subjectivities, and a plethora of narratives about cinephilic life and experience.” Shambu’s “new cinephilia” moves beyond “predominantly aesthetic” concerns toward a “deep curiosity about the world and a critical engagement with it.” We agree wholeheartedly that film “teaches us about the human and nonhuman world in new and powerful ways” and aim to produce, solicit, and publish writing that “radiates outward, powered by a spirit of inquiry and a will to social and planetary change.” Shambu closes his manifesto with a call for “a cinephilia that is fully in contact with its present, global moment—that accompanies it, that moves and travels with it.” We share this call, and we hope both to consider what this might look like within our undergraduate community (are there shared concerns unique to us? Can film help us to articulate the nature of our hope and unrest?) and also how we, as students the world around, might be poised uniquely to give voice to—and thereby make shareable—our aspirations and fears as a generation. We are especially interested in publishing experiences and interactions with cinema in our current climate, as shaped by COVID-19, the US presidential election, Black Lives Matter, and calls for and insecurities about social justice the world around.

In addition to working with writers and contributing reviews/essays (as appropriate), we will create a regular column about what we’re watching now, brief essays that address whatever combination of escapism and immersion, of challenge and relief, works for us in a given week; we would love for these columns to inspire our readers to join us in experiencing these media forms. In coming weeks, look for our coverage of Hendrix College’s Windgate Museum of Art’s Let Us March On, a virtual and local exhibit about Black Lives Matter. In our own work and in that which we read, we seek perpetually to privilege approaches that transform and open films (and moving image media) more than approaches that delimit and shut down thinking. Whether revisiting canonical films with a fresh perspective or championing new films, whether pointing out privilege or arguing for its undoing, whether celebrating joyous film experiences or bemoaning the opposite, whether describing iPhone screenings or theatrical exhibitions: we hope to read work that shapes the future, that imagines—as a way toward realizing—what all of us together, at our best, can become.

Posted in Hendrix | Comments Off on Film Matters Online: Vision Statement and Guiding Principles. By Sydney Boone, JaZmyn Shambley, and Sophia Stolkey

King of Staten Island (2020). Reviewed by Livi Edmonson

Pete Davidson in The King of Staten Island (Universal Pictures, 2020)

Judd Apatow’s latest installment, The King of Staten Island (2020), is a semi-autobiographical film about comedian and Saturday Night Live star, Pete Davidson, and his life growing up in Staten Island. The generic elements and tropes of the “coming-of-age” narrative are evident throughout, but are showcased through a twenty-four-year-old bum of a character, versus the typical teenage character so often seen in the genre, which offers a refreshing tone to this branded character type ahead of the film. The comedy begins with Davidson’s character, Scott Carlin, cruising on the highway, lost in his own thoughts and likely in the midst of mental breakdown, causing two cars to crash behind him. Now, this opening scene may appear to be intense and even triggering due to the actions described, but The King of Staten Island’s cinematic style, although suggesting there is something wrong in our first glimpse of the protagonist, also keeps the scene contemporary, as rap music blares through the speakers of the vehicle and cameras home in on Scott’s focused face through the overhead mirror. The casual cinematography and the thunderous sound put us right in the car with Scott and, at first, it is hard for us to tell if it is the music that is what has his full focus or something else. When he starts to blink aggressively, eventually clenching his eyes shut for too many seconds too long, this is where the crash comes in. Undoubtedly, the crash was Scott’s fault but, after seeing him in a such a panicked state for unknown reasons, we want to believe that it was not his fault. It is more than obvious that Scott feels terrible about everything, as he mutters “sorry” to himself as he drives off. Already, this seems to be a habit of our deadbeat son and wannabe tattoo artist protagonist: avoiding every emotional confrontation that life throws at him. The cinematography and editing for this film’s introduction alone already set King of Staten Island’s cinematic style apart from Apatow’s other films, letting the audience know that we are in for a more serious comedy from the start.

Continue reading
Posted in Reviews | Comments Off on King of Staten Island (2020). Reviewed by Livi Edmonson

Sarah Matthews, Author of FM 10.3 (2019) Article “Threshold Figures: The Babysitter in American Film”

Daniel Hillard (Robin Williams) becomes the liminal nanny in order to save his family in Mrs. Doubtfire (Twentieth Century Fox, 1993)

Film Matters: Please tell us about your article that is being published in Film Matters.

Sarah Matthews: My research began with a desire to investigate the one-dimensional and often negative on-screen representations of babysitters, as well as the formulaic narratives that have become inseparable from them. I was equally daunted and motivated by the fact that there appeared to be no research dedicated exclusively to this body of work. The major finding of my article is that babysitter films can be categorized into three basic storylines, each of which aims to respond to the gender and generational shifts of their production’s context.

Continue reading
Posted in Interviews | Comments Off on Sarah Matthews, Author of FM 10.3 (2019) Article “Threshold Figures: The Babysitter in American Film”

Jason Husak, Author of FM 10.3 (2019) Article “I Aint Afraid of No Remake: Exploration of the Financial, Marketing, and Societal Failure of Ghostbusters: Answer the Call”

Snapchat filter used to promote Ghostbusters (Columbia Pictures, 2016). THR Staff

Film Matters: Please tell us about your article that is being published in Film Matters.

Jason Husak: I really wanted to write an article that showcased the different representations of feminism in film. As a feminist, myself, I find it fascinating how some films use feminism to sell a picture as a tacky new trend rather than as a method to educate and push the conversation further. Specifically, in my article, I explore how Ghostbusters: Answer the Call explores the former by using women as the cheap gimmick to sell the rebooted franchise rather than as vehicles for change in an impactful and progressive way.

Continue reading
Posted in Interviews | Comments Off on Jason Husak, Author of FM 10.3 (2019) Article “I Aint Afraid of No Remake: Exploration of the Financial, Marketing, and Societal Failure of Ghostbusters: Answer the Call”